Alana Subasic vs Ekaterina Yashina Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Yashina has outperformed Subasic in second serve success over the past six months, securing 39.46% of points compared to Subasic's 35.01%. Does this give Yashina an upper hand in rallies? It likely does.
• In returning second serves, Subasic excels with a conversion rate of 53.87% against Yashina's 46.51%, suggesting that Subasic might dominate in receiving games.
• Yashina holds an edge in saving breakpoints, achieving a 49.4% success rate, whereas Subasic has a slightly lower rate of 43.72%.
• While Yashina's overall win percentage in the past year stands at 48.61%, Subasic has performed better, boasting a win rate of 60.78%.
• Yashina shines most on indoor hard courts with a 57% win ratio, whereas Subasic's best performances are on hard courts with a 62% victory rate.
• Yashina typically competes in Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 43.24% of these matches, while Subasic has a stronger record in Futures/ITF tournaments, with a 74.36% win rate.
• Subasic has played against higher-ranked opponents, with an average player rank of 115.18, compared to Yashina's opponents who average a rank of 380.6.
• In deciding sets over the past year, Yashina has a slight advantage, winning 41% compared to Subasic's 33%.
• When it comes to breakpoints, Subasic exhibits a higher conversion rate of 38.75% versus Yashina's 34.51%, possibly indicating stronger clutch play.

Editorial Prediction (September 12, 2025, UTC):

As we examine the recent performance patterns between Yashina and Subasic, a clear division in strengths and opportunities emerges. While Yashina demonstrates a superior second serve and breakpoint save rate, Subasic's consistent performance in returning serves and overall match wins presents a compelling case.

Subasic's ability to compete against higher-ranked opponents might provide them additional strategic insights and competitive resilience. However, Yashina's edge in deciding sets could be pivotal if the match reaches a close contest.

Considering these factors, Subasic appears to have a slight advantage due to their superior overall match win record and return game efficacy. Thus, while both players have their distinctive strengths, Subasic seems more likely to triumph in this upcoming encounter.